Friday, November 24, 2006

Friday and a little Five

Alright, so real quick, I'm on the prowl for another Friday Five...doing some shopping of sorts. There are a ton of sites offering Firday Five lists, and I may continue to do my own five, but i prefer that my own lists and such are done in a more random fashion. So I've decided that when i have a little more time, I'm gonna find a new Friday Five site to link to and pull from. I've looked at a couple already...very promising.

On another note, I'd like to put out there that I'm a huge supporter of the following: www.globalorgasm.org

It's a movement to have everyone in the world have a simultaneous orgasm 9as much as that's possible) on Dec. 22nd, in hopes of affecting global energy waves. Rock on. ny movement that asks me to get off is a movement I'm a fan of. Check it out, and participate, if possible.

So without further ado, here's my super quick Friday Five:

Guilty!

1) Guilty Pleasure when it comes to...Film: Bad Movies. I mean Really Really bad movies. I have a friendster profile and on it I mention that both the Lambda movies are among my favorite films. Part of me isn't joking. That shit is Entertaining!

2) Guilty Pleasure when it comes to...The Internet: Apart from porn? Blogs. All Blogs, especially those related to a) lesbians b) MTV teens c) ex-girlfriends and exes of current girlfriends. I love Blogs! Reading a snippet of someones life, especially if you have no idea what it would be like to be them, is awesome. I've often said I'd love to have the ability to be a fly on the wall of, like, bars and social venues of crowds that I would Never be around...you know, like bars in strip malls and such. Well Blogs are sort of like the electronic version of that shit. Except without invading privacy, 'cause if you're puttin git online, you gotta expect that someone might read it.

3) Guilty Pleasure when it comes to...Television: Reality TV. I know it's wrong, especially since it's Killing the industry I myself work for, but it's just so hard not to watch.

4) Guilty Pleasure when it come to...Food: Food? Not Liquids? 'Cause that would be all that is bad...beer, pop, caffeine. But for food, well, I guess lately it's been all that is sugar (thanks for that babe) especially cookies.

5) Guilty Pleasure when it comes to...Music: Fine! I Confess, yes I do know the words to more than One Backstreet Boys song. How can I not? They are just so damn Easy to remember, and so damn Easy to sing. Dammit!


And that is that! Have a good weekend all. And if you're out there...I know you're listening.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Focus!

The following exerpt is taken from the "Focus on the Family" Website...with some minor edits from, well, me.

Why Christians Should Not Be Allowed to Marry

Many people, even Homosexuals, are confused by the arguments they are hearing today on the subject of Christian marriage. Superficially, what the advocates are saying may seem fair and logical. Scratch the surface, however, and you’ll find that their assertions don’t hold up.

This article contains some of the frequently asked questions and often-heard statements about this important issue, along with the answers that will help you in the debate. This is a cataclysmic social battle, and it will be with us for some time to come. No citizen can afford to sit this one out on the sidelines.

Q. Shouldn’t two people who love each other be allowed to commit themselves to one another?

A. Absolutely, and people do that all the time. But we don’t call it marriage. There are lots of loving commitments that are not marriage. Friends are committed to each other, a parent is committed to a child, grandparents to their grandchildren, and people are committed to their pets. All of these are forms of love. All of them result in commitments. None of them is marriage.

Q. What’s wrong with letting Christians marry?

A. No human society—not one—has ever tolerated “marriage” between extremely uncool people as a norm for family life. And that is what is at stake here, making “marriage” between devout Christians as normal as between Regular people. It is saying that neither arrangement is any better than the other.

This public meaning of marriage is not something that each new generation is free to redefine. Marriage is defined by the people—and a wise society will protect themselves from the unstylish and the simple-minded. Marriage and child-rearing is the way our culture promotes survival of the fittest, provides a way for poeple to build a regular life together, through awareness and consumerism, and assures every child has parents that aren't religious freaks.

Q. Christians can’t have Normal children, but many other couples can’t as well. Why do we let Them marry?

A. This is the exception and not the rule. Many of these childless couples adopt, and their adoptive children receive the benefits of Normal Primetime television watching parents this way. It is impossible for a Christian couple to bestow that benefit—since Christians only watch CTS and CNB.

Q. Isn’t it true that what kids need most are loving parents, regardless of whether or not they have taste, rhythm or any fashion sense?

A. No. A child needs style. A wealth of research over the past 30 years has shown us this. (However, Christian marriage and parenting intentionally deprive children of any sense of trends and fashion.) The most loving Christian mother in the world cannot teach a little boy how to dress so he won't be made fun of at school. Likewise, the most loving Chrstian man cannot teach a little girl how to shop at the cool stores. A gay man can teach his kids how to accesorize. A lesbian can teach her kids how to drive stick or build chic furniture. Is love enough to help two Christians guide their daughter through taunting and ridicule at school for being that "freak" who listens to "Christian Rock" and tells the other kids that sex is wrong? Like a cool gay dad, they cannot comfort her by sharing their first experience of knowing you're the best dressed bitch in the room. Little boys and girls need the loving daily influence of stylish, swank parents to become who they are meant to be, without the sticks and stones of mockery.

Q. Isn’t that cruel?

A. That’s only because of the times in which we live. Our society prizes what seems cool, more than what is "nice". Children truly need to not be raised by dinks, lest they become dinks themselves. It is cruel to intentionally deny them this. The research supporting this is both substantial and unequivocal!

Q. What about Christians who are too old to have children, even adopted ones? We should let them marry.

A. Of course we shouldn't allow older Christians to marry. The reason for supporting the institution of normal marriage is not rooted only in childrearing. Attractive men and women were made for each other, and the State has a compelling interest in supporting it — attractive and stylish children are simply an added bonus.

Q. But isn’t it better for a child to grow up with two loving Christian parents and be forced to watch Growing Pains and the 700 club than to, say, die?

A. You’re comparing the worst of one situation (sock and sandal wearing parents) with death. It's close, but it's still apples and oranges.

Q. Apart from the issue of children, don’t Christians have the same legal right to marry that Well-Liked people do?

A. All people have the same right to marry, as long as they abide by the laws of nature. You cannot marry if you’re boring, you cannot marry if you wear an enormous amount of wool, you cannot inbreed, and you should never marry someone who listens to Pat Robertson. Let’s be clear, everyone has access to marriage as long as they meet the requirements. This is not about access to marriage. It‘s about saving us from another dull repressed family on the block that you have to avoid inviting to your parties, lest they try to start a game of Charades.

Q. But Normal people can marry. Why shouldn’t Christians be allowed to marry?

A. Then nature itself is intolerant. Marriage has not been “imposed” upon culture by some "cool" institution or "popular" power from which it needs to be “set free.” It was established by the people, and their tastes, and is enforced by natural selection. Christians tend to be, well, lower on the evolutionary totem pole. And as such, we should start looking to weed them out of the gene pool altogether.

Here’s what is intolerant. Christian “marriage” is being forced upon us by a small, but elite, group of individuals dressed in polyester and tweed—judges—who say that thousands of years of human history have simply been wrong. They think they can change how we view them. That is a very ingorant notion that will bring great harm to our culture.



Save our towns, and the poor children, from allowing people like this to get married.

In Another Life...





...In Another Life, I would like to come back and have Jon Stewart and Tina Fey be my parents. I don't care that they aren't married to each other, this is my fantasy world and in it they are in love and raising me to rule the world with fairness, intelligence and pure comedic timing.

Thank You.

Friday, November 17, 2006

Hiatus Friday Five

It's that time of week, and even though I am officially on hiatus from work, I've wealesed my way to a computer and am prepared to my Five (not so) Random Questions:

Music Does In Fact Make The World Go Round

1) Name a Band That Deserves to Run the World: Does it Have to be a band? Or can it just be one person. 'Cause if I could pick one guy, it would be David Bowie. But if it was going to be a entire band, I'd probably go with either Broken Social Scene (minus all the in-fighting) or all the members of the Police.

2) If You Could Remove a Band From Music History it would be: Simple Plan. I mean, I know it might be better to go back and stop the root of a problem by chopping off some band that was the originator of it being okay to suck and still make millions, but no matter where my brain goes, it always ends up back at a glaring tacky super bright ugly ass obnoxious yellow neon sign that says "Simple Plan". Someone please make their career end.

3) You Have the Option to Become a Member of a Band. Skills aside, Who would you join? Wow. So I have the option to become a Contributing member of one of my fave bands? That, my good friend, is pretty close to Heaven for me...So who would it be? Who consistently puts out good music and continues to make it seem like I might want to spend lots and lots of time with them? Wow. Um...I would say Broken Social Scene except (yes, I said it already) for all the in-fighting. And yes I'm more than aware that if I chose them I would get to hang out with Emily Haines, but maybe it's best if I just get to keep the dream alive and not ruin it with reality. So I'm going to say Zero 7. They continue to put out excellent records and they seem pretty open to trying new things. And they travel alot. And they kinda kick ass, so.....
Honourable mention: MSTRKRFT. Like the Canadian Zero 7. And sometimes they hang out with Emily Haines.

4) Band on Band Arena Brawl. Name the Two Bands: Simple Plan and the Sex Pistols. 'Cause I would pay to see Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicous kick the crap out of Simple Plan.

5) You can name Two Rockstar Godparents to Your Children. One Male, One Female: Well, I would have picked David Bowie, but I'll probably outlive him. So I'm basing this on who could care for my kids if I died and had no family. And I want my kids to have options, so I'm gonna pick Alanis Morrisette and Mos Def. Mainly 'cause I think they are both upstanding individuals and Mos Def is playing in the background.

And that's it!

On another note, a while back i made a list of five couples I thought rocked celebrity-dom....I competely left out the best couple ever to grace Hollywood, Rhea Perlman and Danny DeVito. Married 25 years, they are a pillar of everything Not Hollywood And Successful. Word!

Friday, November 10, 2006

Friday!

Yet again, checked out the Friday Five and it was really really similar to a Firday Five I did in May....I mean come on, it hasn't even been seven months and you can't think of new questions?

So then let's move on.

In homage to the Americans Midterm Elections, A political Five (i guess not so) Random Questions:

I Approve This Message!

1) If offered the oppurtunity, with all expenses covered, would you run for political office? Yes. Even though in my current life position I hardly possess the criteria necessary to run for any kind of political office (at least without being laughed out of the debating arena), the idea of running for politics fascinates me. Like most people, I hold the belief that "I could do it better". I know I have no real idea of what is involved in holding a position of actual political power, but i would totally be up for giving it a shot.

2) Would you run for Mayor? Premier? Prime Minister? Or President? Mayor sounds cool, but not big enough for me. I want to affect laws and future societies....and President is waaaay too much hot water for me. So Prime Minister Please.

3) What would be your platform (or the platform you would support if you're not running)? Well, I guess I'm as lefty as it comes. I would legalize gay marriage, legalize pot, while making the producing and selling of pot entirely a governemnt run operation. (and even thoug it's not my place I would also push our big cities to move the last call back to 4 a.m. and use the additional liquor tax money gained help fund tourism). i would cut military spending ('cause really, our military sucks...we couldn't hold off Mexico if they decided to take us over) and boost funding for medicinal research and environmental causes and awareness. I would tax large corporations and environment tax. And I would sign the Kyoto Protocol.

4) As a leader, who would you model yourself after? Winston Churchill.

5) As a nation, who impresses you the most? I love Canada. But if I had to look outside of us (and based on my limited knowledge of other countries politics and such), I'd probably look at places like the Netherlands, and maybe Spain. (Truth be told, I simply looked up places that had legalized same sex marriage. I figured that would be a good sign of progressive thinking in government...Netherlands and Spain popped up. And I've heard some good things about the Netherlands so....).


And that brings us to the end of this weeks politically slanted list of questions. Word!






Have a good Weekend!

Friday, November 03, 2006

Another of My Own Friday Fives...

...since the other Friday Five sucks Balls (it was something to the effect of describe your home, did you have trouble waking up this morning, blah blah blah, crap crap crap...). Balls!

So in light of my previous post invovling people doing good things (and also in light of me seeing Borat last night), I'm gonna pick my five questions accordingly:

Where?

1) If you could own a country, which one would it be? Wow, good question. I mean, my heart is with Canada, but think of the possibilites. I could take over a third world country and try to fix it, or I could just do what I wanna do and move over to Europe...except owning and running a country is a lot of work so it's gonna have to be one that seems pretty easy to run. I've always liked Spain and they have a pretty liberal view of gay stuff and they do seem to stay out of political hot water for the most part so....Dave suggested a small island which doesn't necessarily seem like a bad idea. Like the Dominican Republic. Or Cuba. Except hurricane season really makes me rethink that...Mitch suggested Uruguay. Which also seems like a good idea....the mountains, the climate....Decisions, decisions...I'm gonna say Costa Rica. It's called the Switzerland of the Americas, I know of countless people who move down there for months at a time due ot it's lovely secenery and peaceful nature and the climate is excellent. So why the hell not? I'll make Costa Rica the New Gay Paradise. The marketing for tourism would be awesome!

2) If you could force two countries to co-exist Without any violence (let's pretend the populations are equal and each person gets an electrical shock if they try to hurt someone) which two would you choose? Easy for one....the States...and who would I make them learn about....Indonesia.....yeah! I'm so gonna put good 'ol Tex in the same room with some guy from one of the smaller islands who Actually Has to hunt and kill his own food with his bare hands (not to mention that Indonesia is the most populous Muslim-majority nation). Talk about expanding some minds! Good luck Tex!

3) Currently some of the richest countries in the world are Luxembourg, the United States and Japan. Turn the tables and pick three countries to strike it rich. They are: Canada, Ethiopia (one of the poorest African countries and also the one with the biggest population, so hopefully this could stimulate the entire surrounding African region...), and...let's say....New Zealand. Last time I checked, they didn't start any wars...

4) North America is sinking! And you need to move to a new country. Where would you go? (assuming most countries are accepting our sorry asses): I've always wanted to live in Spain. but what would I do for work? I don't even speak the language. And I also hafta assume that my friends and family will have to fend for themselves and that Kate would be coming with me....I'm probably going to say (don't kill me Kate) Australia. They have a film industry, english is their main language and apparently the weather's beautiful...Of course, if I wasn't worried about my job, I'd probably pick Spain...or Costa Rica...

5) Take one country, any country, right off the planet. As if it never existed (and yes it Sounds alot like Genocide, but we're talking about a hypothetical game, not wiping out an entire race with bloodshed...): Well Germany certainly hurt alot of people. And Italy before them....or England. But I'm talking today, as of right now. And as much as I may detest how the Americans view the rest of the world I'm still somewhat glad that it is Them who won the cold war and not the Russians. So if, as of today, I Had to make a country disappear?...wow....there really is no way for this not to seem offensive. For purely peaceful reasons, I'm gonna say Afghanistan. Or North Korea. But probably Afghanistan.

Tough questions, and certainly took a while for me to answer them. But it did make me look at a map a whole lot harder. Wow, now that I'm done thinking, I'm gonna go watch somethign on You Tube. Later!

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Wanna Save the World, Come up With an Idea Like This

So I was watching PBS last night (what can I say? I don't have cable and my girlfriends an intellectual hippie...) and on Global Frontline they were doing a story about a couple from San Fransisco who started a micro-lending website to help small entrepreneurs from third world countries. When you get a chance, check it out: http://www.kiva.org , 'cause this is the shit that's really gonna help level out the world...

Toodles!